<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Lunchtime Legend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk</link>
	<description>Musings of an activist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 22:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Officially Not Fat by Bel</title>
		<link>http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/2011/12/officially-not-fat/comment-page-1/#comment-32673</link>
		<dc:creator>Bel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 22:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/?p=532#comment-32673</guid>
		<description>Oh, I&#039;m having trouble with this open ID again. :(
Anyway, well done, Ralph! I lost 1.5 stone after I had led an unhealthy lifestyle for that long that none of my clothes fit any more, and I didn&#039;t want to accept the new fat me and buy new clothes. I joined Beatrice on fitness pal and went on a diet. I started to cycle regularly, too. I feel fine now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I&#8217;m having trouble with this open ID again. <img src='http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> <br />
Anyway, well done, Ralph! I lost 1.5 stone after I had led an unhealthy lifestyle for that long that none of my clothes fit any more, and I didn&#8217;t want to accept the new fat me and buy new clothes. I joined Beatrice on fitness pal and went on a diet. I started to cycle regularly, too. I feel fine now.<br />
<span class="cluv">Bel recently posted..<a class="118b1e8284 32673" rel="nofollow" href="http://bel-goes-blog.blogspot.com/2011/12/bilingual.html">Bilingual/zweisprachig</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Officially Not Fat by jade jones</title>
		<link>http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/2011/12/officially-not-fat/comment-page-1/#comment-32654</link>
		<dc:creator>jade jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/?p=532#comment-32654</guid>
		<description>well done mate :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well done mate <img src='http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Officially Not Fat by beatrice</title>
		<link>http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/2011/12/officially-not-fat/comment-page-1/#comment-32650</link>
		<dc:creator>beatrice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/?p=532#comment-32650</guid>
		<description>Woohoo!  Well done you!  I&#039;ve lost a stone and a half over the past year, so I can empathise (particularly with the fun in experimenting in healthy recipes)

Looking good ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woohoo!  Well done you!  I&#8217;ve lost a stone and a half over the past year, so I can empathise (particularly with the fun in experimenting in healthy recipes)</p>
<p>Looking good <img src='http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Officially Not Fat by Donna</title>
		<link>http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/2011/12/officially-not-fat/comment-page-1/#comment-32647</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/?p=532#comment-32647</guid>
		<description>Nice one Ralph. Just goes to prove you don&#039;t need gimmicks to lose weight! And butternut squash... I am a convert!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one Ralph. Just goes to prove you don&#8217;t need gimmicks to lose weight! And butternut squash&#8230; I am a convert!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tarragon and Dijon Chicken with Tagliatelle by Sheila</title>
		<link>http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/2011/07/tarragon-and-dijon-chicken-with-tagliatelle/comment-page-1/#comment-22753</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/?p=523#comment-22753</guid>
		<description>Great recipe! Really easy to follow. Oh, and thanks for sharing the BBC link. Very helpful. I&#039;ve always been scared of slicing onions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great recipe! Really easy to follow. Oh, and thanks for sharing the BBC link. Very helpful. I&#8217;ve always been scared of slicing onions.<br />
<span class="cluv">Sheila recently posted..<a class="192ea0826b 22753" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cnacertificationprograms.org/cna-certification">CNA Certification</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tarragon and Dijon Chicken with Tagliatelle by Esther Montgomery</title>
		<link>http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/2011/07/tarragon-and-dijon-chicken-with-tagliatelle/comment-page-1/#comment-19861</link>
		<dc:creator>Esther Montgomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 21:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/?p=523#comment-19861</guid>
		<description>Radical cuisine?

Esther</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radical cuisine?</p>
<p>Esther</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My take on Google Plus by Ralph Ferrett</title>
		<link>http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/2011/07/my-take-on-google-plus/comment-page-1/#comment-19045</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Ferrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/?p=518#comment-19045</guid>
		<description>A big difference I think though is that Google don&#039;t require Plus to &quot;win&quot; the social wars just to be successful and have a lot of users. Both Twitter and Facebook are only in the business of Social so they have to monetise that. Google have fingers in a lot of different pies so for them being moderately successful would both add to their business model and cause problems for FB and Twitter.

Still I don&#039;t know it is a mountain to climb. At least unlike Wave and Buzz they have not fallen off the mountain already!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A big difference I think though is that Google don&#8217;t require Plus to &#8220;win&#8221; the social wars just to be successful and have a lot of users. Both Twitter and Facebook are only in the business of Social so they have to monetise that. Google have fingers in a lot of different pies so for them being moderately successful would both add to their business model and cause problems for FB and Twitter.</p>
<p>Still I don&#8217;t know it is a mountain to climb. At least unlike Wave and Buzz they have not fallen off the mountain already!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My take on Google Plus by Steve McAleer</title>
		<link>http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/2011/07/my-take-on-google-plus/comment-page-1/#comment-19043</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve McAleer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/?p=518#comment-19043</guid>
		<description>My first thoughts: it is a very nice interface, certainly. In terms of usefulness right now, I would rate it as nicer than Twitter, but worse than Facebook.

The big obstacle will be in getting the critical mass of people to switch over from Facebook. Once potential way that happens is that it replaces Twitter - if the big names from Twitter move to G+ they would likely drag their stalkers (sorry, &quot;followers&quot;) along with them. With time the balance of power could shift to G+ as more people migrate until it becomes pointless to remain on Facebook.

On the other hand, maybe Facebook is too entrenched now and there isn&#039;t enough incentive for people to move for the sake of it. I certainly can&#039;t see the need for multiple FB/G+ style networks, since the whole point is that you want to be able to contact everyone in one place. The advantage Google has is that this contact looks more streamlined.

I think success for Google Plus would require killing Facebook and Twitter; it will be interesting to watch the fight, at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first thoughts: it is a very nice interface, certainly. In terms of usefulness right now, I would rate it as nicer than Twitter, but worse than Facebook.</p>
<p>The big obstacle will be in getting the critical mass of people to switch over from Facebook. Once potential way that happens is that it replaces Twitter &#8211; if the big names from Twitter move to G+ they would likely drag their stalkers (sorry, &#8220;followers&#8221;) along with them. With time the balance of power could shift to G+ as more people migrate until it becomes pointless to remain on Facebook.</p>
<p>On the other hand, maybe Facebook is too entrenched now and there isn&#8217;t enough incentive for people to move for the sake of it. I certainly can&#8217;t see the need for multiple FB/G+ style networks, since the whole point is that you want to be able to contact everyone in one place. The advantage Google has is that this contact looks more streamlined.</p>
<p>I think success for Google Plus would require killing Facebook and Twitter; it will be interesting to watch the fight, at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My take on Google Plus by Ralph Ferrett</title>
		<link>http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/2011/07/my-take-on-google-plus/comment-page-1/#comment-19040</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Ferrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/?p=518#comment-19040</guid>
		<description>I think you make a lot of good points there TBH Alex. Facebook in the 900lb Gorilla and they are not oging to give up their crown lightly. But the very fact everyone is on FB and they are so successful is one of the reasons why others have a chance. Lots of people are fed up with FB and if another social networking site gets momentum it can get into a good position. As we have seen with Twitter over the last two year. The history of recent tech is the history of seemingly dominant giants falling  by the wayside when a better product comes along. Lotus, netscape, AOL but most pertinently to this debate MySpace (funny to think only a couple of years ago yoofs were being referred to as the MySpace generation!!). Now whether or not Plus is the next thing is of course open to debate but history shows it can happen.

On the uncluttered/its all fields emptiness to be fair to Google it is still in Beta and it is bound to be that way. But it is a huge barrier to a new SN coming along, why would people bother migrating over if they get what they want on FB. I&#039;d say the best chance is if opinion formers start using Plus because it offers them something better than FB and they talk about it a lot then lots of others will follow (again as we have seen with twitter in the last two years). I think it is possible that Plus might offer that but we shall have to wait and see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you make a lot of good points there TBH Alex. Facebook in the 900lb Gorilla and they are not oging to give up their crown lightly. But the very fact everyone is on FB and they are so successful is one of the reasons why others have a chance. Lots of people are fed up with FB and if another social networking site gets momentum it can get into a good position. As we have seen with Twitter over the last two year. The history of recent tech is the history of seemingly dominant giants falling  by the wayside when a better product comes along. Lotus, netscape, AOL but most pertinently to this debate MySpace (funny to think only a couple of years ago yoofs were being referred to as the MySpace generation!!). Now whether or not Plus is the next thing is of course open to debate but history shows it can happen.</p>
<p>On the uncluttered/its all fields emptiness to be fair to Google it is still in Beta and it is bound to be that way. But it is a huge barrier to a new SN coming along, why would people bother migrating over if they get what they want on FB. I&#8217;d say the best chance is if opinion formers start using Plus because it offers them something better than FB and they talk about it a lot then lots of others will follow (again as we have seen with twitter in the last two years). I think it is possible that Plus might offer that but we shall have to wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My take on Google Plus by Alex</title>
		<link>http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/2011/07/my-take-on-google-plus/comment-page-1/#comment-19034</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lunchtimelegend.co.uk/?p=518#comment-19034</guid>
		<description>Considering Google&#039;s previous social networking incarnation took off like a leaden fart (Google Buzz was it?) I suspect a similar fate may befall this.

In my eyes, FaceBook&#039;s success is that it&#039;s a version of Friend&#039;s Reunited that actually works and isn&#039;t populated solely by people our mothers&#039; age trying to find long lost relatives who are willing to pay a monthly subscription. I&#039;m still a vociferous user of FaceBook, but it was clearly best when I was getting friend requests from interesting/hot/long forgotten people from my past. These days, despite checking it multiple times a day, it works more as a universal email account where occasionally people post some photos which catch my interest.

Now clearly Google are the people to talk to regarding a single multi-purpose email account, but whether they&#039;ll manage to get the critical mass which makes the project lift off like FaceBook did is doubtful. I&#039;ve already found near enough everyone I&#039;ve ever encountered on FaceBook, and those that aren&#039;t on it are hardly likely to now appear on +; so why the need to switch?

The profile page, for all its uncluttered beauty, leaves me wanting a little more. When I received an invite to join FaceBook 4 years ago or so (was it that long ago?!), despite being the first of our lot on it, there were already plenty of friend suggestions and the possibility of seeing what people from VIth form are up to now. With + I&#039;ve got a couple of suggestions from you, and (since I primarily use my Gmail account for business/close family mail) friend suggestions that include the Tesco Customer Service Team.

Maybe in the future it may become ones de facto contact point; maybe it will be seen as less pally than FaceBook and due to the Circles feature, a better way of managing business and busom buddy contacts. I&#039;m certainly on it, but then I like this sort of thing, but I can&#039;t see people flocking to it in the numbers required to make it a go-er.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering Google&#8217;s previous social networking incarnation took off like a leaden fart (Google Buzz was it?) I suspect a similar fate may befall this.</p>
<p>In my eyes, FaceBook&#8217;s success is that it&#8217;s a version of Friend&#8217;s Reunited that actually works and isn&#8217;t populated solely by people our mothers&#8217; age trying to find long lost relatives who are willing to pay a monthly subscription. I&#8217;m still a vociferous user of FaceBook, but it was clearly best when I was getting friend requests from interesting/hot/long forgotten people from my past. These days, despite checking it multiple times a day, it works more as a universal email account where occasionally people post some photos which catch my interest.</p>
<p>Now clearly Google are the people to talk to regarding a single multi-purpose email account, but whether they&#8217;ll manage to get the critical mass which makes the project lift off like FaceBook did is doubtful. I&#8217;ve already found near enough everyone I&#8217;ve ever encountered on FaceBook, and those that aren&#8217;t on it are hardly likely to now appear on +; so why the need to switch?</p>
<p>The profile page, for all its uncluttered beauty, leaves me wanting a little more. When I received an invite to join FaceBook 4 years ago or so (was it that long ago?!), despite being the first of our lot on it, there were already plenty of friend suggestions and the possibility of seeing what people from VIth form are up to now. With + I&#8217;ve got a couple of suggestions from you, and (since I primarily use my Gmail account for business/close family mail) friend suggestions that include the Tesco Customer Service Team.</p>
<p>Maybe in the future it may become ones de facto contact point; maybe it will be seen as less pally than FaceBook and due to the Circles feature, a better way of managing business and busom buddy contacts. I&#8217;m certainly on it, but then I like this sort of thing, but I can&#8217;t see people flocking to it in the numbers required to make it a go-er.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

